Market cap $9.81M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 1-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 49% chance higher tomorrow · this pattern's 1d calls hit 47.5% of 12,192 — no better than a coin flip so far · drawn from the 3315 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next day
−20%−10%0%+10%−5%0%+5%+10%+15%+10% in 30 days↑ 92% below its all-time high
−30dnow+1d
▲ 10 rose · ▼ 9 fell · ◆ 11 sideways(±1.0% over 1 day)
Bold: ORDER's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 3315 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next day — real hourly closes, scaled to ORDER's volatility. 30 with no hourly path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0371−3%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.03840%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0400+4%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
0.0%
Likely range
−3% to +4%$0.0371 – $0.0400
4,561 similar setups · our 1-day calls hit 50.2% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
ORDER price prediction for this week
50%chance ORDER is lower
↔ COIN FLIP
Market cap $9.81M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 7-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 50% chance higher in 7 days · this pattern's 7d calls hit 59.1% of 38,104 — no better than always guessing the usual direction (60%) so far · drawn from the 3315 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next 7 days
−20%−10%0%+10%−20%−10%0%+10%+20%+10% in 30 days↑ 92% below its all-time high
−30dnow+7d
▲ 11 rose · ▼ 11 fell · ◆ 8 sideways(±2.7% over 7 days)
Bold: ORDER's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 3315 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next 7 days — real 4-hour closes, scaled to ORDER's volatility. 30 with no 4-hour path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0342−11%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.03840%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0439+14%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
0.0%
Likely range
−11% to +14%$0.0342 – $0.0439
4,200 similar setups · our 7-day calls hit 59.2% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
ORDER price prediction for the next 30 days
61%chance ORDER is lower
▼ STRONG DOWN
Market cap $9.81M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven record on this coin yet — the prediction above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 39% chance higher in 30 days · drawn from its 3315 matched past setups
next 30 days
−20%−10%0%+10%−50%0%+50%+100%+150%+10% in 30 days↑ 92% below its all-time high
−30dnow+30d
▲ 11 rose · ▼ 13 fell · ◆ 6 sideways(±5.7% over 30 days)
Bold: ORDER's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 3315 past setups like this, and what each did over the next 30 days — real daily closes, scaled to ORDER's volatility.
Bad case$0.0266−31%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0365−5.0%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0520+35%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−5.0%
Likely range
−31% to +35%$0.0266 – $0.0520
3,315 similar setups · our 30-day calls hit 62.9% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
Pick a side, when you close and your leverage: we replay that exact trade on the past cases behind this ORDER prediction and count how it ended.
No trade window for ORDER was profitable in most similar past cases with a positive average result and liquidations at or under 10% (n=3315).
Chance this ends in profit—
Typical result—half did better, half worse
Chance you get liquidated first—
Every past case, replayedhover or tap a line to see the case
price went your way —against you —sideways —(within ±2.6% over 7 days)✕liquidated —take profit hit —stop loss hit —typical8 in 10 cases
Replays 397 past cases weighted exactly like the 30-day prediction: the 3,315 similar cases behind it plus a sample of all history.
Where the odds were best· swipe for longer holds →
cell = chance of profit color = average result, −50% or worse to +50% or better striped = liquidated in more than 1 in 10★ best: highest typical result with at most 1 in 10 liquidated, most cases in profit and an average above zerono take profit or stop loss · tap a cell to load it
The planner and its replay chart run in your browser: turn on JavaScript to replay your own ORDER trade on these past cases.
Odds from similar past cases, not financial advice. Leverage multiplies losses too: a liquidated position loses its whole margin.
Where to trade ORDER · by share of the last day's volume
ORDER$0.038951% ▼ 1Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 1Dopen calculator
ORDER$0.038950% ▼ 7Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 7Dopen calculator
ORDER$0.038961% ▼ 30Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 30Dopen calculator
2
Why we think this
the reasoning, in short
Drivers
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher a day later 46% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in ORDER's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (4,561 cases) into 49% higher.
91% below its high
91% below its all-time high. Coins that far below their high were higher a day later 47% of the time (138,098 cases), vs 46% across all cases.
here 47% · normal 46% higher a day later
Normal volume
Trading volume is in its normal range. On normal-volume days, coins were higher a day later 46% of the time (174,983 cases), vs 46% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 46% higher a day later
Micro-cap
Micro-cap coin ($9.8M market cap). Coins this size were higher a day later 46% of the time (94,305 cases), vs 46% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 46% higher a day later
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a day later 46% of the time (94,012 cases), vs 46% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 46% higher a day later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 7 days later 42% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in ORDER's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (4,200 cases) into 50% higher.
Up 10% over 30 days
Up 10% over the last 30 days. After a month like that, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (40,654 cases), vs 42% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 42% higher 7 days later
Within 7% of a week ago
Within 7% of its price a week ago (−4%). After a week like that, coins were higher a week later 42% of the time (91,745 cases), vs 42% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 42% higher 7 days later
91% below its high
91% below its all-time high. Coins that far below their high were higher a week later 42% of the time (136,394 cases), vs 42% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 42% higher 7 days later
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a week later 42% of the time (92,118 cases), vs 42% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 42% higher 7 days later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 30 days later 36% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in ORDER's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (3,315 cases) into 39% higher.
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher 30 days later 39% of the time (84,631 cases), vs 36% across all cases.
here 39% · normal 36% higher 30 days later
Up 10% over 30 days
Up 10% over the last 30 days. After a month like that, coins were higher 30 days later 34% of the time (36,874 cases), vs 36% across all cases.
here 34% · normal 36% higher 30 days later
91% below its high
91% below its all-time high. Coins that far below their high were higher 30 days later 38% of the time (129,463 cases), vs 36% across all cases.
here 38% · normal 36% higher 30 days later
Micro-cap
Micro-cap coin ($9.8M market cap). Coins this size were higher 30 days later 37% of the time (87,264 cases), vs 36% across all cases.
here 37% · normal 36% higher 30 days later
What moves ORDER
LIKELYWhen Bitcoin rose 3% or more in a day, ORDER ended higher the next day 68% of the time, against 46% on any day28 cases · on average +2.2% against -0.3% · last Sep 21, 2026
tested coin by coin every night, each cause against ORDER's own moves on any day (its biggest days capped) · proven: past the cut for testing thousands at once, both halves of its history agree, 12 cases or more · likely: weaker evidence, watch it · what moves every coin
Our record on ORDER
Our last 6 calls on ORDER over 30 days: right on 0 of 6 · 4 of 6 ended inside our range · all-time on ORDER: 70.8% hit rate, 81.2% inside the range (48 backtested calls)
Aug 2 said 61% down · ended +16.9%✗ wrongAug 9 said 60% down · ended +24.8%✗ wrongAug 16 said 70% down · ended +12.2%✗ wrongAug 23 said 59% down · ended +29.4%✗ wrongAug 30 said 71% down · ended +23.1%✗ wrongSep 6 said 67% down · ended +10.0%✗ wrong
white: ORDER's real price after each call · bar: the range we gave (8 in 10 cases, the middle half thicker, a notch at the typical move) · end dot: green right · red wrong · orange the price went sideways (within ±5.5% over 30 days) or a coin flip · backtest: each call used only data available that day · live since Oct 4, 2026: 3 live 30-day predictions on record, first result due Nov 3, 2026 · the full scorecard →
last 6 months · daily close · candle = 2 sessions◆ recorded event · dotted blue line = last price · orange = the price went sideways (within ±1.4% over 2 days)
as of · generated from this record's own rowsread it →
events on record
23
higher 30 days after
4 of 10
typical 30-day move
−4.3%
next up
—
Every eventMEASURED23 events
The record: every event and what followed
as of · CoinPaprika · DefiLlama · exchange announcements · PatternPlus effectsread it →
ORDER: 23 events, newest first; six signed numbers per row are the price change from the close before the event, in UTC; vs BTC is the difference of the two 30-day moves
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 46% during 2026-10-01, from $29M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2026-10-03, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. ORDER saw a TVL crash on Oct 3, 2026; the day-30 effect will be recorded in 27 days (day 1: −2.0%).
Users paid ORDER's protocol $53k in fees in the week to 2026-08-24 (DefiLlama), 2.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2026-08-26: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Aug 26, 2026 ORDER saw a fee surge; it rose 10.8% by day 1 and was 35.9% higher 30 days later, 29 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +10.9% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $52k in fees in the week to 2026-04-22 (DefiLlama), 3.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2026-04-24: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Apr 24, 2026 ORDER saw a fee surge; it rose 7.9% by day 1 and was 6.6% lower 30 days later, 5 points behind BTC; it had moved −13.4% in the 7 days before.
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 32% during 2026-04-11, from $14M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2026-04-13, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. On Apr 13, 2026 ORDER saw a TVL surge; it rose 9.3% by day 1 and was 2.4% higher 30 days later, 10 points behind BTC; it had moved +13.6% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $36k in fees in the week to 2025-12-23 (DefiLlama), 0.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-12-25: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Dec 25, 2025 ORDER saw a fee slump; it fell 3.9% by day 1 and was 1.9% lower 30 days later, 4 points behind BTC; it had moved +15.3% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $71k in fees in the week to 2025-11-28 (DefiLlama), 0.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-11-30: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Nov 30, 2025 ORDER saw a fee slump; it fell 10.6% by day 1 and was 18.3% lower 30 days later, 16 points behind BTC; it had moved +6.1% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $214k in fees in the week to 2025-10-11 (DefiLlama), 2.1 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-10-13: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Oct 13, 2025 ORDER saw a fee surge; it fell 6.2% by day 1 and was 40.8% lower 30 days later, 29 points behind BTC; it had moved −37.0% in the 7 days before.
all-time high ORDER all-time high: $0.4956
—
+56.2%
−13.1%
−33.1%
−58.5%
−42.7%
−75.0%
derived
Highest daily close in our price history. On Oct 6, 2025 ORDER set an all-time high; it fell 13.1% by day 1 and was 58.5% lower 30 days later, 43 points behind BTC; it had moved +56.2% in the 7 days before.
ORDER-USDT-SWAP perpetual trading. On Sep 30, 2025OKX opened perpetual futures for ORDER; it rose 1.2% by day 1 and was 43.1% lower 30 days later, 38 points behind BTC; it had moved +17.4% in the 7 days before.
ORDERUSDT perpetual trading. On Sep 26, 2025Binance opened perpetual futures for ORDER; it rose 37.3% by day 1 and was 54.8% higher 30 days later, 50 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +20.2% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $75k in fees in the week to 2025-08-03 (DefiLlama), 2.1 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-08-05: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Aug 5, 2025 ORDER saw a fee surge; it fell 2.6% by day 1 and was 17.7% higher 30 days later, 21 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +4.1% in the 7 days before.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $40k in fees in the week to 2025-03-25 (DefiLlama), 0.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-03-27: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee slump on Mar 27, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 45% during 2025-03-14, from $14M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-03-16, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. ORDER saw a TVL surge on Mar 16, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $65k in fees in the week to 2025-02-10 (DefiLlama), 0.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-02-12: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee slump on Feb 12, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $149k in fees in the week to 2025-01-19 (DefiLlama), 2.2 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-01-21: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee surge on Jan 21, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $35k in fees in the week to 2024-12-29 (DefiLlama), 0.5 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2024-12-31: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee slump on Dec 31, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 35% during 2024-10-05, from $14M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-10-07, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. ORDER saw a TVL surge on Oct 7, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
ORDERUSDT perpetual trading. Bybit opened perpetual futures for ORDER on Aug 27, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $104k in fees in the week to 2024-08-12 (DefiLlama), 0.4 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2024-08-14: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee slump on Aug 14, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 24% during 2024-07-04, from $40M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-07-06, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. ORDER saw a TVL crash on Jul 6, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
ORDER's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 23% during 2024-05-28, from $29M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-05-30, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. ORDER saw a TVL surge on May 30, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $369k in fees in the week to 2024-04-10 (DefiLlama), 2.8 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2024-04-12: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee surge on Apr 12, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Users paid ORDER's protocol $51k in fees in the week to 2024-02-03 (DefiLlama), 4.4 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2024-02-05: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. ORDER saw a fee surge on Feb 5, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Source: events from CoinPaprika, DefiLlama and exchange announcements; effects computed by PatternPlus (see methodology) · fetched
Against the venue medianMEASURED
How ORDER's events compare with the venue median
as of · event_stats computed by PatternPlusread it →
Venue · kind
ORDER median day 30
ORDER n
Venue median day 30
Venue n
Up after 30 d (venue)
Position
all venues · fee surge
+5.5%
4
−2.3%
424
46.7%
above
all venues · TVL surge
+2.4%
1
−11.2%
247
33.2%
above
all venues · fee slump
−10.1%
2
−8.3%
373
35.7%
below
all venues · all-time high
−58.5%
1
−40.6%
455
5.7%
below
OKX · perpetual listing
−43.1%
1
−22.0%
142
30.3%
below
Binance · perpetual listing
+54.8%
1
−19.3%
248
33.9%
above
Venue · kind
ORDER median day 7
ORDER n
Venue median day 7
Venue n
Up after 7 d (venue)
Position
all venues · fee surge
+5.4%
4
−1.3%
—
—
above
all venues · TVL surge
−2.9%
1
−3.0%
—
—
above
all venues · fee slump
−4.4%
2
−3.1%
—
—
below
all venues · all-time high
−33.1%
1
−17.7%
—
—
below
OKX · perpetual listing
−2.8%
1
−13.9%
—
—
above
Binance · perpetual listing
+94.6%
1
−8.4%
—
—
above
Day 7: the venue's event count and up-share are kept for day 30 only (—); its median uses every event measured to day 7.
Venue · kind
ORDER median day 1
ORDER n
Venue median day 1
Venue n
Up after 1 d (venue)
Position
all venues · TVL crash
−2.0%
1
−0.0%
—
—
below
all venues · fee surge
+2.7%
4
+0.2%
—
—
above
all venues · TVL surge
+9.3%
1
−1.0%
—
—
above
all venues · fee slump
−7.2%
2
−0.7%
—
—
below
all venues · all-time high
−13.1%
1
−3.7%
—
—
below
OKX · perpetual listing
+1.2%
1
−2.6%
—
—
above
Binance · perpetual listing
+37.3%
1
−0.7%
—
—
above
Day 1: the venue's event count and up-share are kept for day 30 only (—); its median uses every event measured to day 1.
Issuer powers first recorded on Oct 4, 2026: mint authority unknown, freeze authority unknown, upgrade key unknown, admin keys unknown, honeypot unknown, pause unknown, blacklist unknown, transfer tax unknown.
OUR NUMBERS ABOVE · PUBLIC FACTS BELOW
Where ORDER is listedON RECORD4 venues
Where ORDER is listed: spot and perpetuals, with dates
as of · exchange instrument APIs · announcementsread it →
Exchange coverage matrix: 4 venues on record; cell text is the listing date
Source: PatternPlus, computed from every token in the peer set · fetched
4
The full write-up
every sentence on ORDER · questions · sources
ORDER in short
Orderly Network (ORDER) is a crypto token on its own chain, with no start date recorded; rank #872 by market cap as of Oct 6, 2026, 92.1% below its Oct 6, 2025 high.
As of Oct 6, 2026 the price is $0.0389 (+0.1% over 24 hours), market cap $9.8M, fully diluted value $38.9M, holder count not reported, $15.9M TVL.
Status on CoinPaprika: active; ORDER is the native coin of its own chain, so there is no token contract.
CoinPaprika tickers and DefiLlama, read Oct 6, 2026.
As of Oct 6, 2026 the record for Orderly Network runs to 23 events, of which 0 are spot listings, 3 perpetual listings, 0 unlocks, 0 hacks and 0 funding rounds; 10 carry a day-30 measurement with a median of −4.3%.
From the latest data refresh
Orderly Network (ORDER), crypto on its own chain, holds rank #872 by market cap on Oct 6, 2026 and trades 92.1% under its Oct 6, 2025 high.
Its 2 measured listings show a median day-30 move of +5.8%, 1 of them above the venue median.
4 daily snapshots run from Oct 3, 2026 to Oct 6, 2026; over that span the rank went from #862 to #872.
2 spot pairs and 3 perpetual instruments are live for ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026, starting with Bybit on Aug 27, 2024.
2 of its listings have a measured day-30 outcome (median +5.8%); 1 finished above the venue's own listing median and 1 below.
No unlock schedule is on record for ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026.
ORDER is a native coin: its supply and rules follow protocol rules, and no issuer key was found to check as of Oct 6, 2026.
No funding round is recorded by DefiLlama for Orderly Network as of Oct 6, 2026.
Orderly Network lists 1 audit link on DefiLlama; no hack is recorded as of Oct 6, 2026.
No team member is recorded on CoinPaprika for Orderly Network as of Oct 6, 2026.
DefiLlama reports $15.9M TVL and not reported revenue over 30 days as of Oct 6, 2026.
Generated from this record's own rows at build time; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Across 424 fee surges across every token on record, the median move is +0.2% on day 1 and −2.3% by day 30; 46.7% were still up after 30 days; ORDER's 4 sit above that median at +5.5%.
Across 247 TVL surges across every token on record, the median move is −1.0% on day 1 and −11.2% by day 30;
33.2% were still up after 30 days;
ORDER's one sits above that median at +2.4%.
Across 373 fee slumps across every token on record, the median move is −0.7% on day 1 and −8.3% by day 30;
35.7% were still up after 30 days;
ORDER's 2 sit below that median at −10.1%.
Across 455 all-time highs across every token on record, the median move is −3.7% on day 1 and −40.6% by day 30;
5.7% were still up after 30 days;
ORDER's one sits below that median at −58.5%.
Across 142 perpetual listings on OKX, the median move is −2.6% on day 1 and −22.0% by day 30;
30.3% were still up after 30 days;
ORDER's one sits below that median at −43.1%.
Across 248 perpetual listings on Binance, the median move is −0.7% on day 1 and −19.3% by day 30;
33.9% were still up after 30 days;
ORDER's one sits above that median at +54.8%.
ORDER sits above the venue median in 3 of 6 venue-and-kind comparisons as of Oct 6, 2026.
event_stats recomputed nightly; as of Oct 6, 2026.
The issuer holds 0 of 0 checked powers as of Oct 4, 2026; 13 not checked, 0 not applicable.
Whether the issuer can mint new tokens, freeze accounts, upgrade the contract, change balances, act through a hidden owner, blacklist addresses, restrict transfers to a whitelist, pause transfers, take a tax on purchases, take a tax on sales, block resale, hide the contract source and act through admin keys was not checked: no dexscreener response for those fields on Ethereum as of Oct 4, 2026.
security rows per chain and tokens.powers; vocabulary fixed: held, revoked, unknown; checked Oct 4, 2026.
23 events since Feb 5, 2024; 6 of the 10 measured were followed by a lower price 30 days later; best Binance lists ORDER perpetual on Sep 26, 2025 (+54.8%), worst ORDER all-time high: $0.4956 on Oct 6, 2025 (−58.5%).
502 daily closes from May 23, 2025 to Oct 6, 2026 are plotted on a log scale, with the rank from 4 snapshots as a step line.
The all-time high marker sits at $0.4956 on Oct 6, 2025, 365 days before Oct 6, 2026.
prices, metrics_daily, events and effects; as of Oct 6, 2026.
The change log holds 21 entries between Oct 4, 2026 and Oct 6, 2026; the newest reads: New record entry (fees jump, Apr 12, 2024): Fees up 2.8x: ORDER's protocol took $369k in a week.
As of Oct 6, 2026 ORDER trades on 2 spot venues and 3 perpetual venues with dated listings, from Bybit on Aug 27, 2024 to OKX on Sep 30, 2025; the first perpetual opened on Bybit on Aug 27, 2024.
0 delistings are on record for ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026.
1083 of the 1087 tracked exchanges have no ORDER listing on record as of Oct 6, 2026 (Pionex, Azbit, Coinbase, Bitget, WEEX and Biconomy, among others).
exchange_listings from instrument APIs and announcements; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Orderly Network trades 92.1% below its all-time high of $0.4956, set on Oct 6, 2025, 365 days before Oct 6, 2026; over 30 days it moved 0.0% against 0.0% for BTC (beta 1.66).
Price change as of Oct 6, 2026: 0.0% over 1 hour, +0.1% over 24 hours, −4.3% over 7 days, 0.0% over 30 days, 0.0% over 1 year.
With $9.8M market cap against $38.9M fully diluted, 74.8% of ORDER's valuation is in non-circulating supply as of Oct 6, 2026.
24-hour volume of $3.2M is 32.6% of market cap as of Oct 6, 2026.
Circulating supply is 252.1M of 1B total (25.2%) and a maximum of 1B.
The all tokens on record median 30-day change is 0.0% across 1541 tokens, so ORDER sits below its peer set.
CoinPaprika tickers read Oct 6, 2026; BTC comparison from the BTC record.
1 address identify Orderly Network on ethereum; as the native coin of its own chain it has no token contract.
No other token on record uses the symbol ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026.
Orderly Network shares its ticker with ORDER (Pyramid LiquidityOrder ) (ticker collision on CoinPaprika, read Oct 6, 2026).
Identity fields from CoinPaprika as of Oct 6, 2026: start date not recorded, first market data Sep 5, 2024, proof type not stated, organisation structure not stated, no whitepaper link.
Cross-references as of Oct 6, 2026: CoinPaprika id order-orderly-network, DefiLlama slug orderly-network, no GitHub repository recorded.
No follower or star counts were read for Orderly Network as of Oct 6, 2026.
CoinPaprika /coins and DefiLlama /protocols (contract addresses), token_contracts, token_aliases; read Oct 6, 2026.
Set against 1541 all tokens on record tokens on Oct 6, 2026, Orderly Network ranks at the 43rd percentile for market cap, the 58th for distance from its high and the unranked for share of supply unlocked.
The peer median market cap is $13.7M, the median distance from ATH −94.7% and the median 30-day change 0.0%.
The nearest peers by rank are LeverFi (#871), AdEx (#873), Caldera (#874), saffron.finance (#869) and Moonwell (#875).
Market cap: $9.8M (P43 of 1541; peer median $13.7M).
Volume / market cap (24h): 32.61% (P92 of 1541; peer median 2.49%).
30-day change: 0.0% (P50 of 1541; peer median 0.0%).
Distance from ATH: −92.1% (P58 of 1541; peer median −94.7%).
TVL: $15.9M (P59 of 421; peer median $5.4M).
peer set: all tokens on record (1541 tokens); as of Oct 6, 2026.
As of Oct 6, 2026: 51% chance ORDER is lower tomorrow — a coin flip, typical move 0.0%, likely range −3.5% to +4.1%, from 4,561 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
What is the Orderly Network price prediction for this week?
As of Oct 6, 2026: 50% chance ORDER is lower over the next 7 days — a coin flip, typical move 0.0%, likely range −10.9% to +14.4%, from 4,200 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
What is the ORDER price prediction for the next 30 days?
As of Oct 6, 2026: 61% chance ORDER is lower over the next 30 days, typical move −5.0%, likely range −30.7% to +35.4%, from 3,315 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
How accurate are these ORDER predictions?
Across 48 backtested 30-day calls on ORDER, the call was right 70.8% of the time and the price ended inside the likely range 81.2% of the time.
Of the last 6 30-day calls, 0 of 6 were right.
Each backtest call used only the data available on its own date.
Who is behind Orderly Network?
No team member is recorded on CoinPaprika for Orderly Network as of Oct 6, 2026; the organisation is described as not stated.
When is the next ORDER unlock?
No future unlock is on record for ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026.
Is ORDER listed on Binance?
Yes; Binance listed ORDER and perpetual futures on Sep 26, 2025.
Can the issuer mint more ORDER?
Not checked: no dexscreener response for ORDER as of Oct 6, 2026.
How far is ORDER from its all-time high?
92.1% below the $0.4956 high of Oct 6, 2025, 365 days ago, at $0.0389 on Oct 6, 2026.
Has Orderly Network been hacked?
No hack is on record for Orderly Network as of Oct 6, 2026; 1 audit link is listed.
Related records
Related records
as of · chosen deterministically from the joins on this page
10 related token records are linked below, plus 4 exchanges (Binance, Bybit, OKX and Upbit) as of Oct 6, 2026.
483 of our coins trade as Binance perpetuals; the 200 biggest read: 197 tonight (open interest, accounts long, top traders, takers), funding caught up on 196 (93889 readings); 75341 coin-days stored; 774 funding extremes as events; the rest comes over the next nights
45,323 coin-driver tests; 23 proven on 20 coins, 1840 likely
2026-10-06 04:21 UTC
none
—
edge
35 kinds of event against their coins' ordinary days, by day; a clear edge (95% range, both halves agree) up for cpi, fees_jump, funding_low, down for delisting, futures_listing, hack, kr_discount, listing
2026-10-06 05:12 UTC
none
—
effects
11829 effects, 51 stats rows
2026-10-06 04:20 UTC
none
—
etherscan
skipped: no ETHERSCAN_KEY in data/config_local.py or the environment
521 of our coins trade as Gate USDT perpetuals; 512 read tonight, 88377 coin-days stored; 4 liquidation spikes as events; the rest is read on the next nights
176 of our coins trade as Hyperliquid perps; 23 read up to now tonight (122 pages), 9278 coin-days stored; 153 funding extremes; the rest of the history comes over the next nights
819 of 1541 coins have a logo (coingecko 709, trustwallet 105, jupiter 4, website 1). Tonight 0 asked. Without one, by rank: RAIN, CC, WETH, JITOSOL, RETH, KHYPE, RSETH, WBNB, SUSDE, SYRUPUSDC, METH, JLP (drop a file in data/curated/logos/<slug>.png)
7 proven signals: ath after (30d), ath after (7d), funding_low after (1d), pump after (1d), pump after (7d), unlock after (1d), vol_spike after (1d); 29 of tonight's predictions moved
2026-10-06 04:20 UTC
none
—
snapshot
daily snapshots and the change log
2026-10-06 04:38 UTC
none
—
snapshot_org
1423 governance votes on 40 coins from 40 Snapshot spaces; tonight 0 proposals read (to 2026-09-10), 0 big closed ones kept, 3 open or pending; 0 events new, 0 removed
167 rules tested; 4 survived discovery and the holdout (4 new tonight): max_30:low:1d:q20:all, skew_30:low:14d:q10:all, volume_trend:low:1d:q10:all; 4 in the book
57 of 260 coins due fetched (4 from CoinGecko, 53 from CoinPaprika; 29 with schedule files, 350 of the top 400); no CoinGecko id for 2: STABLE, WTRX; CoinGecko stopped: HTTP 429
10 of 169 coins with 120+ days of supply history release on a monthly or quarterly pattern; 39 releases projected: APT (monthly, day 14), ARB (quarterly, day 18), ENA (monthly, day 6), ETHFI (quarterly, day 17), GRASS (monthly, day 29), IO (monthly, day 1), KCS (quarterly, day 1), MOVE (monthly, day 9), STRK (quarterly, day 16), WLD (quarterly, day 21)
2026-10-06 03:35 UTC
none
—
teamfinance
1 of 42 coins hold Team Finance vesting; 4 contracts still being read for the first time
2 of 5 feeds read, 2 series kept, 158 points written tonight; failed: gdelt:ethereum: HTTP 429: Please limit requests to one every 5 seconds or contact kalev.leetaru5@gmail.com for larger queries. All high-traf; gdelt:regulation: HTTP 429: Please limit requests to one every 5 seconds or contact kalev.leetaru5@gmail.com for larger queries. All high-tr; gdelt:hack: HTTP 429: Please limit requests to one every 5 seconds or contact kalev.leetaru5@gmail.com for larger queries. All high-traffic
Effects are measured as described on the methodology page. Facts are compiled from public sources; nothing on this page is advice. Corrections: hello@pattern.plus.
ethplorer last fetched successfully on Oct 6, 2026 03:31 UTC;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T03:31:11+00:00 HTTP 429 https://api.ethplorer.io/getTokenInfo/0xabd4c), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
fred last fetched successfully on an unrecorded time;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T03:35:01+00:00 no FRED_API_KEY: the jobs, PPI, PCE, GDP and retail sa), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
x_coinpaprika_g last fetched successfully on an unrecorded time;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T04:11:08+00:00 coinpaprika_g:global: HTTP 402: { "type":"payment_requ), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
This page is generated from 5,737 database rows and rebuilt daily; first published Oct 4, 2026.
PatternPlus compiles facts from public sources and gives no financial advice; corrections by email. As of Oct 6, 2026.
How to read this
Band 1 is the prediction: the chance of a higher price, the typical move and the likely range, with the real past setups behind it drawn as they moved.
Band 2 is why: the drivers, the next events and how our past calls on this coin went.
Band 3 is the data: every table and chart, dated; green means the price was higher afterwards, red lower.
Band 4 is the write-up: the same record in words, with the questions and the sources.